For the first 10+ years of my entrepreneurial journey, I was too focused on the number of employees as a key measure of success. When meeting other entrepreneurs, one of the first questions I asked to gauge the size and scale of their business was, So, how many employees do you have now? While that question is still relevant today, it is much less so than in the past.

Productivity per employee has increased tremendously. The ability to leverage software and other systems for scaling has improved dramatically. The nature of work has also evolved, with more remote and hybrid work arrangements and a greater reliance on contractors and freelancers. My previous belief that W-2 employees were a key proxy for success no longer holds. In fact, many predict that we will see more billion-dollar companies in the future with only a small handful of employees.

Last week, I heard an entrepreneur say he wants to double the size of his business without increasing headcount. This doesn’t mean keeping the exact same team but rather using AI to boost productivity, outsourcing more functions, and recruiting higher-skilled employees when attrition occurs. The key idea is that as teams grow, management and leadership demands increase, and the organization tends to move more slowly. In this case, the entrepreneur operates at considerable scale, and there is also a focus on increasing annual recurring revenue per employee as a key metric for business health. The goal isn’t to build the largest team possible—it’s to build the most efficient and successful one.

Entrepreneurs in the growth stage would benefit from considering how they could double their revenue without adding new headcount. What positions would remain? Which ones would be outsourced? Which roles would need to be filled by more experienced hires? What would be the advantages and drawbacks? Entrepreneurs should evaluate the relationship between in-house employees and scale earlier than they might have in the past.